Homepage.
Introduction.
Site Updates 2014/2015.
Family News 2014/2015.
Family History 17thC.
Family Tree.
Family Articles.
Family Photo Index.
Links.
Contact.

Background:

 

( with acknowledgement to Jack Malvern's article in The Times newspaper  dated 13 January 2009)

 

A mass protest by women in the UK, campaigning to be allowed to vote, has finally come to public attention almost a century too late to make a difference. Hundreds of suffragettes risked prosecution in 1911 by spoiling their census forms in a concerted revolt.

 

But the full impact of their boycott has not emerged until recently because of secrecy rules. Census information is usually kept secret for 100 years but the 1911 documents were released three years early.

 

The documents show how women refused to fill in their names and left comments in the margin. One suffragette taking part in the boycott arranged by the Women's Freedom League wrote: “If I am intelligent enough to fill in this paper, I am intelligent enough to put a cross on a voting paper.”

 

Another glued a poster over the form stating: “ No votes for women, no census.” A piece of paper stuck to the form suggests that the women stayed away from households where the census was taken to attend a protest in Trafalgar Square. This public protest was reported in the newspapers at the time but its full extent remained hidden to the public. It was a meeting of the Women's Freedom League to explain the boycott but newspaper reports suggested that almost all of those present at the meeting were men!

 

Women were granted the right to vote in 1918 although they were not given equal voting rights until 1928.

 

The 1911 Census is the most revealing to be published because for the first time it includes the handwritten entries from the heads of each household. In earlier surveys the only surviving documents had been the summaries produced by professional enumerators, who excised any attempts at humour.

 

Jokes that have survived in the 1911 documents include a man whose entry describes an occupant of his house as “Peter Tabby”. Lists the occupation as “mouser”and his nationality as “Persian”. The enumerator has crossed out the entry with red ink and noted sternly: “This is a cat”.

 

Because of personal commitments over the past three years I have not been able to search for the 1911 Census information until recently. Now (Oct 2011) I have traced almost every Family member alive in 1911 and downloaded copies of their census return. Their personal information on the census  returns I will now start to add to their personal notes section of the Family Tree.

 

Have I been able to track the hand of the suffragettes on any Family returns?

 

Well, the answer on one, at least, is yes!

 

Take a look at the following page for a copy of the return of Bernard and Matilda GUNNER. A self-employed Baker and his 2nd wife and family living at Hailsham, West Sussex. Bottom left  on the return is a red tick and letter 'O' from the pen of the enumerator as he verified the number of people in the household.

 

Can you see anything unusual?

 

“Matilda gunning for the Censor”: 1911 England and Wales Census

        (the secret suffragettes who refused to be counted)

continue